Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes
Taxes are differentiated by the impact they have on the allocation of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind of tax that impinges the same relative burden on all taxpayers—i.e., in the case where tax liability and income increase in relative levels. A progressive tax is recognisable by a more than proportional rise in the tax burden in relation to the rise in income, and a regressive tax is characterized by a less than proportional increase in the related liability. So, progressive taxes are viewed as taking away the lack of equality in income distribution, while regressive taxes may have the result of increasing these inequalities.
The taxes that are normally thought to be progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are initially progressive, however, may become less so in the upper-income group—in particular if a taxpayer is permitted to lower his tax base by nominating deductions or by taking some income parts from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates if applied to lower-income demographics could also be more progressive if exemptions of a personal nature are made.
Income measured over the period of a year may not absolutely give the most appropriate measure of taxpaying ability. For example, transitory growth in income might be saved, and within temporary declines in income a taxpayer might select to provide for consumption by taking from savings. Ergo, if taxation is made comparable alongside “permanent income,” it should be less regressive (or more progressive) than when it is compared with annual income.
Sales taxes and excises (save those on luxuries) are mostly regressive, because the dissemination of personal income consumed or spent on a specific good lowers as the amount of personal income rises. Poll taxes (also called head taxes), nominated as a set amount per capita, obviously are regressive.
It is difficult to term corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, principally because of the uncertainty surrounding the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of nominating who bears the tax burden depends for the most part on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being decided.
In assessing the economic purpose of taxation, it is essential to distinguish between varied ideas of tax rates. The statutory rates will be nominated in the law; commonly these are marginal rates, but sometimes they are median rates. Marginal income tax rates denote the fraction of incremental income that is taken by taxation when income rises by one dollar. Ergo, if tax liability increases by 45 cents when income increases by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax regulations generally contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that grow as income rises. Structured analysis of marginal tax rates should take into account provisions as well as the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lessens by 20 cents for each one-dollar growth in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points greater than nominated within the statutory rates. Since marginal rates specify how after-tax income increases or decreases in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the appropriate ones for appraising incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to realise the marginal effective tax rate applicable to income from business and capital, as it may be reliant on factors such as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem determines that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is zero under a consumption-based tax.
Average income tax rates determine the fraction of total income that is required in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is in consideration for considering the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate increases with income. Average income tax rates commonly rise with income, both because personal allowances are granted for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; on the other hand, preferential treatment of income received predominantly by high-income households may dwarf these effects, allowing regressivity, as signified by average tax rates that lower as income increases.
For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.
Comments
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!